(12-05-2017, 01:37 PM)coded Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But why did you post it [the blog on Villa 'dEste] so late after giving me so much grief about what I found on the House of Este? I would not say 1466 is a century away from what the VMS is!
Stellar, I have enough data to post dozens of blogs, and many partly written blogs that I don't have time to finish right now. I have work-related responsibilities that take priority—I don't have time to post even 1/20th of the material I have collected in the last 9 years. I don't even have time to read all the forum threads. I post as I have time and as it seems relevant.
The date for my information is not 1466. You posted about a different time period in the history of the d'Este family. I blogged about another branch of the family—something that happened later.
I never gave you grief about investigating the House of Este. I questioned your assumptions and research methods. You were cherry-picking shapes out of tarot cards to make them look like Voynich glyphs even when many of them didn't. That's not research, that's projection, or flim-flam, however you want to interpret it.
coded wrote: I like the site JKP maybe you are leaning towards D'este and the VMS!
I'm not leaning in any direction. I'm doing research. I don't know where it will lead me. The Villa d'Este was one of the earlier ideas I had for how the VMS rosettes page MIGHT be interpreted. It's a reasonably good fit, but it's not the only possibility (water-garden predecessors to the VMS might fit better). I've had a number of ideas since and I will write them up if I can find time.