[split] Aga Tentakulus' Logical System

[Stefan Wirtz_2]

[..]
But what if Google read it as ‘datis’, which is actually two words: ‘dat is’?

You (or Google) would enter a world of pain.

"datis" is a form of dare, "geben"/giving, you see it at Caesars page.

"dat" is 3rd person singular, "er/sie/es gibt" / he gives.

But "is" can mean "derjenige" / the one, 
as well as 2nd pers. singular of "ire"= gehen / to go -- "du gehst" / you go.

I think you also checked those on frag-caesar.

So, "dat is" may translate to "er gibt derjenige"(?) or "er gibt du gehst"(??), which is both quite garbage.

Better don't cut those words. 
The same for this one:

Let’s assume that ‘aiin’ is ‘utis’, which means ‘to use’.
Wouldn’t it be possible that ‘ain’ is the split version of ‘utis’ – ‘ut is’? Or the other way round.
Or that ‘adis’ simply becomes ‘ad is’.
From a cryptological point of view.

"ut" and "is" have immediately different meanings when you cut "utis" into 2 parts.

So you mean 8 and 9 are symbols for T- and -us of Taurus?
That's another cliff of your theory:
-us and -um are not really similar, they can mark the difference between nominative and accusative of male nouns, or even -um is indicating a neutrum (nominative) of a noun.
If that "doesn't matter", you will randomly change between subjects or objects of sentences by "choosing" -us or -um.
"Writing" Latin this way will completely destroy the content of a text to unrecognizability.
I don't think this was the intention of VMS' author(s).

But your conclusion about cryptological aspects is wrong:
this is not opening a wider field of "Latin possibilities": in fact, it reduces drastically the chance of VMS written with any Latin intention.
Those few problems above show the strong need for clear precision in Latin texts.
By the time of VMS, Latin existed already for ~2,000 years and was completely developed ; any author in Latin, even thoose with "dialects" or kitchen maidens, knew quite well about the do's and don'ts of this language.

Latin is rather complex by it's full-grown nature, while we have no striking idea about the complexity of VMS and it's source language.
Voynichese does not provide the structure of Latin at all.
It's not Latin.