The Modern Forgery Hypothesis

[ololololo]

It's just that if you've been around this forum for long you've seen the extent to which my comment is true. It all gets tiresome to see, and I reacted to you suggestion prematurely.

Nothing wrong. There are always misunderstandings.

Indirect facts are a hallmark of most of the claims when it comes to the Voynich

By indirect, I meant those facts that seem to be in favor, but still not positive enough. An example of such an indirect statement in the context of this theory is: "medieval experts cannot recognize what is depicted in the book." This is possible if the book was created by a person who is not well versed in medieval art. But there are other reasons...
Also, for example, according to Chinese theory, the red symbols on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. resemble hieroglyphs. But if that’s the case, they may also resemble hieroglyphs for other reasons — for example, if it’s a fake Chinese book...

In an effort to avoid such logical errors, I initially consider the theory to be true, and only then do I pay attention to the errors. The former helps to assess how realistic this view is in principle.

Sorry for the off‑the‑cuff remark...