Nothing wrong. Anyway, if these are hieroglyphs, the author redrew them purely for decoration. He didn’t know what they meant.
The decorative nature is evident from the fact that they are inverted (i.e., the author didn’t attach much importance to their position) and from the fact that they are very much simplified (the largest bird glyph is too simple to be a specific hieroglyph).
These may also be not specific characters, but parodies of them, which the author reproduced from memory. Something like You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
The decorative nature is evident from the fact that they are inverted (i.e., the author didn’t attach much importance to their position) and from the fact that they are very much simplified (the largest bird glyph is too simple to be a specific hieroglyph).
These may also be not specific characters, but parodies of them, which the author reproduced from memory. Something like You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..