05-09-2026, 02:54 PM
I read your thread about how You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. Impressive.
This could be a plus in favor of your theory, but for now I still can’t understand how the VMS text is related to Greek. Your transformations don’t look like a cipher, and the comparison with letters is sometimes ambiguous.
And I see a small nuance here... Although you translated it as scammony, you have an illustration in front of your eyes depicting a plant that looks similar to it. One could first see the similarity to the scammony, and then confirm it using one’s own theory. This isn’t a reproach, but I just want to remind you that in such cases there’s room for bias.
I can do something similar. Let’s assume that Voynichese is encrypted Latin. Let’s take f33r. The first words of the page are tarar daiin. The Latin name for the sunflower (according to the translator) is Messier. We can see that there are coincidences: Messier and tarar daiin. We acknowledge that i and n are the same letters and are equal to e. The letters m, i, and r remain undeciphered; in theory, they should correspond to the letters t, d, and ai.
What am I getting at? The point is that the entire analysis is not focused on deciphering, but on finding similarities with a specific word.
This could be a plus in favor of your theory, but for now I still can’t understand how the VMS text is related to Greek. Your transformations don’t look like a cipher, and the comparison with letters is sometimes ambiguous.
And I see a small nuance here... Although you translated it as scammony, you have an illustration in front of your eyes depicting a plant that looks similar to it. One could first see the similarity to the scammony, and then confirm it using one’s own theory. This isn’t a reproach, but I just want to remind you that in such cases there’s room for bias.
I can do something similar. Let’s assume that Voynichese is encrypted Latin. Let’s take f33r. The first words of the page are tarar daiin. The Latin name for the sunflower (according to the translator) is Messier. We can see that there are coincidences: Messier and tarar daiin. We acknowledge that i and n are the same letters and are equal to e. The letters m, i, and r remain undeciphered; in theory, they should correspond to the letters t, d, and ai.
What am I getting at? The point is that the entire analysis is not focused on deciphering, but on finding similarities with a specific word.