Ruby's Greek Thread

[ololololo]

I am aware that my results are not perfect, but I share them anyway.

Oh, don’t get me wrong! I’m not telling you not to do what you’re doing.
I don’t want to spoil your mood or “destroy” your theory with these questions.
I just want to understand your theory better and, perhaps, make it a little better 

You mention Gerard Cheshire's name quite often; I don't understand exactly why.

Firstly, his proto‑Romanic theory was of a linguistic nature, meaning that, in a sense, he is your "colleague".
Secondly, for me personally, it is the pinnacle of all linguistic theories. His approach is no different from others — you take a word, translate it in your own way, and find similarities. 
The only thing is that you do this with Greek. Others do it with their own languages.
And let’s not forget about Cheshire’s “success” in his theory  

And I don't think he managed to translate the entire text.

As far as I remember, he translated both the signatures (like you) and some excerpts from the text.