18-08-2026, 11:23 PM
If anything, I’m responding to @eggyk. The quick reply function is gone somewhere, and I’m too lazy to copy the template right now.
You’re saying that k = m (in the sense that they’re similar), and m = μ (in the sense that they’re similar in sound), then k = μ
Then p = p (sense-similar), p = pi (sound-similar), then p = pi. And l = γ (sense-similar), γ = g, then l = g. Ruby knows why I’m thinking about EVA l again
One way or another, you equate the letters VMS with their Greek counterparts through correspondence with Latin letters. This doesn’t work... In the case of Voynichese, that’s for sure.
If you don’t believe me, then prove where I’m wrong: EVA b = b = beta; EVA e = c = Russian ц(!). And EVA in and EVA q is equal to this signs (This is the Cherokee script):
You’re saying that k = m (in the sense that they’re similar), and m = μ (in the sense that they’re similar in sound), then k = μ
Then p = p (sense-similar), p = pi (sound-similar), then p = pi. And l = γ (sense-similar), γ = g, then l = g. Ruby knows why I’m thinking about EVA l again
One way or another, you equate the letters VMS with their Greek counterparts through correspondence with Latin letters. This doesn’t work... In the case of Voynichese, that’s for sure.
If you don’t believe me, then prove where I’m wrong: EVA b = b = beta; EVA e = c = Russian ц(!). And EVA in and EVA q is equal to this signs (This is the Cherokee script):