Ruby's Greek Thread

[eggyk]

And the problem with that is that the Voynichese letter that corresponds with EVA "k" (which might or might not correspond with the Latin "m") does not itself correspond with the Latin "m" (unless by pure chance, as nobody knows the actual Latin equivalent of any Voynichese letter - some of them were named in EVA as they had apparent similar written forms to Latin letters, but that's completely arbitrary and absolutely does not imply a Voynichese-to-Latin equivalence).

I don't understand what this means. The post was talking about 3 texts, and the question was to explain the similarity between them. 

And why can we read it this way?
For example,  I don’t see any similarity between k and μ.

The assertion is that EVA "k" looks like latin "m" somehow. Then, seperately, that a latin "m" corresponds to the same sound as greek μ. Therefore, whether EVA "k" looks like μ or not is irrelevant to the point. 

I wasn't saying that's a fact, I was saying that is the assertion.