31-07-2026, 09:52 AM
(31-07-2026, 08:24 AM)Ruby Novacna wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Your last translation: the word xarally (or arally in your transliteration). You have defined it as παραλλάξ. You mistook two l's for two lambdas.(30-07-2026, 08:02 PM)ololololo wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But the question remains: how did l turn into λ?Could you rephrase your question, please?
l is a small loop that doesn't look anything like a lambda. I haven't seen this type of lambda written in any of the manuscripts (but I might not be looking closely). What are the reasons to believe that l is a lambda?

