Ruby's Greek Thread

[ololololo]

Ruby, you've done a lot of work translating many words. 
But I'll dare to ask you a few questions:
1). I don't see any visual similarities between Greek writing and Voynichese. You are translating the words in EVA transliteration, but apparently without looking at the manuscript itself. 
It's just a simple selection of similar words, which was once done by a professor named Gerard. Can these translations mean anything?
2). How often have you received a truly meaningful result (directly from the text, rather than from captions or rare words)?
3). In your last translation, you defined l as lambda (similar to how EVA l is L). In one of your previous posts, you seem to have defined al or ol as alpha.
The shape of the glyphs is stable throughout the manuscript, which means that there is no room for such ambiguity. Or am I missing something?
4). How did Greek become Voynichese?
In fact, your theory may have potential, particularly your interpretations of the "quirks" on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and x as pi. But like any other language theory, I see that there are assumptions and uncertainties. For example, the letter pi can be ch.