The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[ololololo]

In terms?
Compared to the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. handwriting, Voynichese is faster and easier to write than Latin letters. Its letters require only two or three lines and strokes.

How? Could you elaborate on which latin letters take more than two or three strokes? 

c, e, i, l, o, s, can all reasonably be written in 1 stroke
a, b, d, f, g, h, n, p, r, t, u, x, y  can be written in 2 strokes.
k, m, q, w, z can be written in 3 or 4 strokes. 

Note that other than 'm', most of the 3-4 stroke letters are relatively rarer (or potentially non existing) letters, too. 

e,  i,  l,  o,  d,  s   can be reasonably written in 1 stroke. 
a,  ch,  r,  k,  n,  y,  m   can be written in 2.
p,  f,  q,  t   can be written in 3. (t can be 1 or 3 depending on how curved the loops are)

Not to mention it is naturally quicker and easier to write in a system you have learnt and used and practised your entire life.

To write EVA t with a pen, you need at least two strokes: a left line and a loop.
To write EVA s, simply draw the pen twice on the paper. Once for the lower element, and once for the arc itself.
   
The shape of the letter b can also be written in a few strokes, but it will be a little more difficult.
In general, there isn't much of a difference, and I agree that Voynichese is simple in terms of letter shapes and writing speed.