New analysis of f116v, Central Bavarian dialect

[monisusa]

Since the word “Poxleber” was found in an Austrian sermon, I believe it’s highly likely that the marginal notes are Bavarian.

However, reading “mchiton” as “anchiton” has already been discussed; yet interpreting it as “anchiton” = a c hi ton = “an zeh hin tun” and “oladabas” = “als a bas(in)” = “alles ein basin”- in short, “an zeh hin tun alles ein basin” (a toe do in, everything a basin) - requires a high degree of eisegesis. Especially since this sentence doesn’t make any sense at all without heavy interpretation (eisegesis), and other “interpretations” also seem rather far-fetched to me - since they require a high degree of interpretation. Another example: atzia = atzen (to etch) or: mo vix  mo = mollire "erweichen" (melt)  und VIX = V/X Mintutes = 5 / 10 Minutes.

Especially turning the Voynichese into Latin abbreviations - difficult....

I, for one, am not convinced. But of course, that doesn’t mean anything

Hello, thanks for your comment. I explained clearly in my study that the gothic cursive character "a" was misread as "m". Moreover there are interference features that point to a 
scribe who wrote in a language that was foreign to him and therefore uncertain in spelling.