The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[ololololo]

I'm learning Chinese and I watched You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. videos by Koen Gheuens - the supposed "Chinese" language translation feels wrong.

The Starred Parags section (SPS) is definitely a transcription or translation of the Shennong Bencaojing (SBJ). My probability that the coincidences observed between the two texts are due to chance is very small.  

Each Chinese character of the SBJ corresponds to about one word in Voynichese, and about five EVA characters, on average.  I have identified a handful of possible "cribs" -- Chinese characters with specific Voynichese translations -- but only one or two are fairly certain.  The others still need confimation. 

But I still don't know the language and the spelling system (its encoding into glyphs). It is definitely monosyllabic; but that still includes all 50+ languages of China, plus half a dozen languages outside China, like Tibetan and Vietnamese. And the encoding is almost certainly phonetic -- but based on the pronunciation of 600 years ago, which is known to have changed a lot in that interval.

Please have patience, I am working on a more extensive report on the evidence, and answering objections.

All the best, --stolfi

Wow, that sounds interesting. Let me ask you as an expert on Chinese theory:
1. How are the Voynich's words aligned with hieroglyphs? Is this approach worth trusting?
2. Exactly what similarities did you see between the SBJ and Starred Parags texts?
3. Are there any other textual correlations between Chinese texts and the manuscript?
4. If we apply the results of the analysis on the similarity of words and hieroglyphs to other sections, will anything work out?
I apologize for my ignorance, turns out that I know very bad a bit about Chinese theory...