(18-05-2026, 01:43 PM)eggyk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.By initial results, you mean relying on results from the thing you don't want to rely on? Theres a logical inconsistency here: These AI results cannot be trusted and require expert help to verify, yet the entire justification for further expert help is that these initial results are promising?
I think of it as being like a windsock at the airport. Four different types of them give very consistent results, helping to indicate that we are likely to be going in the right direction.
That’s why I brought my results here. Not to show off, but to bring people in on what is very promising ground to explore.
(18-05-2026, 02:20 PM)Rafal wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.By the way, didn't Paracelsus live 100 years after the Voynich Manuscript was created?
How important is he and his concepts in your theory?
From the results that I’m seeing the Voynich manuscript may well be an ur-document of Paracelcian Spagyric medicine some 100 years before its time.
The four paragraphs on f99r consistently follow the same process of separation, purification, recombination and fixation. All with no priming about those things.
I have no dog in the fight about this, but it would certainly act as a nice bonus if those promising results were confirmed.
That’s why I am here, to bring this likely good avenue of exploration to people that can reliably make good sense of things.