Imagine waking up tomorrow with the solution to the Voynich Manuscript.

[DG97EEB]

The problem is here are 10s of thousands of images that "match". I'm not expert, but from everything I've read on art history, that's just not how it works...The burden of proof is significant and doesn't rest on superficial exemplars.

And what if these pictures also coincide with a certain text, go one after the other as in the text and even on many pages in a row. As I already wrote, it will take several years before they stop solving recipes and herbs and baths. Plants are just another layer of code to make it look like a plant at first glance. But thank you for the answers, it is valuable knowledge for me how scientific research and professional science work. I understand that accepting a hypothesis nowadays requires a lot of persuasion and evidence.

But it always did. I'm not dismissing your particular hypothesis. I'm saying that there are some established methods. You're talking to Diane O'Donovan a lot who is an art historian. She can tell you how to proceed.
As for the text, given no one can read it, it's a moot point. If you happened to find images that were broadly similar and text that had the same kind of shape, you'd have something suggestive of, but still not proof... There's no quick path here as proven by the last 100 years of failure...