Imagine waking up tomorrow with the solution to the Voynich Manuscript.

[Koen G]

That's a good question. I'm personally posting my success to the reddit.com/r/voynich forum, and am asking the people in a different popular subreddit that I moderate how they would feel about me sharing my results there too.

We all find out ways.

If your solution involves chatbots at all, it is most likely not allowed here. If not (and you're open to constructive criticism), post ahead!


For solvers worried that their true solution will not be recognized, I repeat what I've said before:

• I, and all Voynich researchers I've spoken to, want the manuscript to be solved.
  
• I know that I won't be the one to solve it.
  
• Thus, I am eagerly waiting for someone else to solve the manuscript.
  
• When a solution with some promise is put forward, this will become clear. This has happened several times in the past, even though so far, none of those theories have managed to live up to the expectations. (Quite on the contrary).
  
• When a solution is proposed that actually works, we will know, because there are many people who badly want to see a good solution.
  

Conclusion: if you post your solution and it is universally rejected by people who have actually studied the manuscript, then you know it's a bad solution.

Note on reproducibility: AI (chatbots) often steers towards this, and there have been dozens of slopmerchants with "reproducible" solutions. This usually means that their chatbot has set up some arbitrary system for them that (in the best case) is reproducible but still completely arbitrary. It would take me 10 minutes to come up with a reproducible transformation of a VM transcription, but that doesn't make it a good solution.