05-05-2026, 04:15 AM
That image had me quite confused, and your perspective seems to make more sense than how my mind was trying to interpret it. It might even make more sense botanically as well (what is the current consensus that the creator of the manuscript could have had connections with a trade route going through Constantinople?).
I am attempting to interpret these images and would appreciate opinions on the following EVA defined glyphs, please (#5 is only present to show how faint parts of <qo> can become);
1, 2 & 3 - <sh>
4 - <t>
5 & 6 - <qo>
I am attempting to interpret these images and would appreciate opinions on the following EVA defined glyphs, please (#5 is only present to show how faint parts of <qo> can become);
1, 2 & 3 - <sh>
4 - <t>
5 & 6 - <qo>