asteckley > 31-10-2025, 07:46 PM
(31-10-2025, 06:42 PM)Jorge_Stolfi Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view."Consistent with a medieval origin" means only that they did not find any evidence of a more recent origin.
asteckley > 31-10-2025, 08:28 PM
(30-10-2025, 03:08 PM)Jorge_Stolfi Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(22-11-2024, 08:31 PM)proto57 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The issue with the Vinland Map titanium was, as you say, that it was in the modern anatase form.
Let me share what I know of the chemistry involved...
Jorge_Stolfi > 31-10-2025, 08:50 PM
(31-10-2025, 07:46 PM)asteckley Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So if a report is reasonably expected to provide evidence for a claim -- or possibly against it -- but instead provides no evidence that can be relied on in either direction (because, for example, it is found to be demonstrably flawed), is it not misleading to claim that it is "consistent" with any particular theory?
asteckley > 31-10-2025, 08:56 PM
(31-10-2025, 08:50 PM)Jorge_Stolfi Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And "compatible with a medieval origin" is basically a more marketing-friendly way of saying that.
Jorge_Stolfi > 31-10-2025, 08:57 PM
(31-10-2025, 08:28 PM)asteckley Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.@Magnesium has also located a reference where a 15th century manuscript's ink was found to contain titanium due to the presence of crystalline quartz [with titanium oxide inclusions]