BessAgritianin's theory thread

[BessAgritianin]

First of all, the mainstream view is that there is no such thing as Moravian language. Either you consider "Moravian" as a dialect of Czech or simply it was used in the past as an another name for Czech, just like "Bohemian".

You are right that standard linguistics classifies Moravian as a dialect group of Czech. My translation however uses words I found in Moravian dictionary, that do not appear in standard Czech dictionaries. For example :
"belina, 1. bylina, zvláště léčivá zelina (záp. Mor.)-Dielekt. Slovnik Moravsky "
The words like these are called "Moravismy"by the Czech lingusts- dialectal elements rooted in Moravian regional speech.

And there is just too much freedom in interpreting the signs. Yet, you still get words that don't exist in any language and are only minimally similar to Czech.
And you throw in words that are in other languages, for example "ili" is Russian, not Czech.

Could you provide exact sign reading where my interpretaion leads to contradiction or implausibility?

 Historical writing systems have symbols with multiple possible readings. A simple example from English:
"C" can be read as "k" in "cat", as "SI" in "city as "TS" in "Cello". 
I do not want to go in Latin or Egyptian since it will be tooo much research.
My system for reading produces meaningful text. 
A general criticism like "too much freedom" without examples is a retreat to an generic objection, which cannot be accepted as serious.
For "ili" refer Ruby's answer.