Hi and welcome!
I'm not sure I agree that the findings as listed are hard to dismiss as artifacts. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but:
This is not a random mapping, as far as I understand, this is some mapping optimized using some Latin corpus or dictionary, which would contain different word forms.
This can easily be a coincidence. Among some 50000 words one matches one of hundreds of images.
In other words, some vocabulary not related to the images. Again, likely a coincidence.
This is important, because this is a clear indicator that the mapping is likely spurious.
I'm not sure I agree that the findings as listed are hard to dismiss as artifacts. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but:
(09-04-2026, 02:25 PM)CorwinFr wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.On f103r, the word "coque" (cook) appears 17 times in 5 conjugated forms: coque, coquas, coquere, coquendo, coquant. A random mapping does not produce a Latin morphological paradigm.
This is not a random mapping, as far as I understand, this is some mapping optimized using some Latin corpus or dictionary, which would contain different word forms.
(09-04-2026, 02:25 PM)CorwinFr wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.On f33r, the pipeline decodes INELIODE. The illustration on the same page shows an Asteraceae. The pipeline cannot see the illustration. Two independent channels pointing to Inula helenium.
This can easily be a coincidence. Among some 50000 words one matches one of hundreds of images.
(09-04-2026, 02:25 PM)CorwinFr wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The astronomical pages (f67r) decode to pharmaceutical vocabulary: spikenard, cinnamon, celery, wine. Nobody expected recipes hidden in star diagrams.
In other words, some vocabulary not related to the images. Again, likely a coincidence.
(09-04-2026, 02:25 PM)CorwinFr wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Never found 5 consecutive words in a known text.
This is important, because this is a clear indicator that the mapping is likely spurious.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)