@ eggyk
If you have any questions let me know this is preliminary as I said in the initial post. The system I'm using is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. along with tiny anagrams on each vord where the system is new. And most often its only one anagram.
1) So if it is preliminary the rules are not set in stone. The vord "airy" simply bled over value of 1 digital root of 1 + 9 = 1 in "ain" 1 for 2.
2) In medieval Latin they are interchanged u and v.
3) I set a rule for eva l to be Latin e and a rule for eva ch is Latin letter a.
To see if I'm correct it would have to meet a high threshold of 50%. Not until all the rules are set will I release a full page if possible as some words may have mistakes or maybe nulls. To repeat a phrase that supposed to be like something the author intended from such few anagrams one at most per word and I believe this be a legitimate system is amazing.
Look what the author possibly said in Latin at the end of the document where you would obviously start decoding this kind of cipher because the last number is "y" for 9. The start of the manuscript does not have numbers in its initial word.
"I declare, Godlike, behold one to derive origin."
This is a huge complement understanding the massive task at decoding and "derived origin" means knowing the system.
With i,q,d,yi,q,d,y all over the text it's hard not to believe it is not part of a cipher.
With just so few vords in an anagram, at most one anagram and two I would say rare 3 and its a new system all the time. It's reproducible.
If you have any questions let me know this is preliminary as I said in the initial post. The system I'm using is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. along with tiny anagrams on each vord where the system is new. And most often its only one anagram.
1) So if it is preliminary the rules are not set in stone. The vord "airy" simply bled over value of 1 digital root of 1 + 9 = 1 in "ain" 1 for 2.
2) In medieval Latin they are interchanged u and v.
3) I set a rule for eva l to be Latin e and a rule for eva ch is Latin letter a.
To see if I'm correct it would have to meet a high threshold of 50%. Not until all the rules are set will I release a full page if possible as some words may have mistakes or maybe nulls. To repeat a phrase that supposed to be like something the author intended from such few anagrams one at most per word and I believe this be a legitimate system is amazing.
Look what the author possibly said in Latin at the end of the document where you would obviously start decoding this kind of cipher because the last number is "y" for 9. The start of the manuscript does not have numbers in its initial word.
"I declare, Godlike, behold one to derive origin."
This is a huge complement understanding the massive task at decoding and "derived origin" means knowing the system.
With i,q,d,yi,q,d,y all over the text it's hard not to believe it is not part of a cipher.
With just so few vords in an anagram, at most one anagram and two I would say rare 3 and its a new system all the time. It's reproducible.