21-03-2026, 05:00 AM
I think the "hoax" theory" is a case of study - how we respond to an unsolved problem.
When an object resists us for a long time, the temptation comes to say the object is invalid, rather than to admit- "We cannot solve it".
It is less genuine argument and more a way of giving up.
Consider two of the most brilliant cryptographers in history- Friedmans, who broke codes that the nation depended on dealt for years with VM.
When they couldn't crack it they considered it to be meaningsless.
"Hoax" is just another word for nothing left to say.
When an object resists us for a long time, the temptation comes to say the object is invalid, rather than to admit- "We cannot solve it".
It is less genuine argument and more a way of giving up.
Consider two of the most brilliant cryptographers in history- Friedmans, who broke codes that the nation depended on dealt for years with VM.
When they couldn't crack it they considered it to be meaningsless.
"Hoax" is just another word for nothing left to say.