This could be a cool hypothesis. For me, the most weird thing is the text. If it is a hoax, the Zipf law (for example) and the connections or strange properties that we see, are they casual? Why would he try to make the text look like a language if the "clients" could barely read their own?
|
Voynich Manuscript as a charlatan's prop
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

