Voynich Manuscript as a charlatan's prop
#4
This is a really interesting theory. However there are some open points that don't fit into the theory.

  • The first words in several plant folios also appear in the "reicpes" section. These are sometimes long, complex words, written by two different set of hands. If this was a charlatan's prop, it would make no sense to exactly reference names/objects in several unrelated sections with such accuracy. I.e., could have just written "mumbo jumbo".
  • What would be the point of making this many pages of very intricately written and designed folios?
  • Why the rosettes? What purpose would they serve a charlatan?
  • There still had to be some system among the scribes, as same words appear in Currier A and B. Why?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Voynich Manuscript as a charlatao's prop - by JustAnotherTheory - 20-03-2026, 02:54 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: