The Book Switch Theory

[Jorge_Stolfi]

Arguing that the evidence for the Tepenec' signature isn't watertight, and then coming up with an alternative for which there is no evidence whatsoever, doesn't cut it for me.

As I see it, there is no evidence for either of the two theories: "the signature was there when Wilfrid got the book", and "the signature was forged by Wilfrid".  None whatsoever.

Our probabilities for each theory derive entirely from our assumptions about Wilfrid's character and motivations. Yours are obviously very different from mine. Agreed, I don't see how we could go beyond that...

All the best, --stolfi