'P' is the key

[eggyk]

The stains could match anything/they match nothing, to which I have openly challenged others to find another stain match with the same rigor I have applied- or to show that there is no significant overlap with the same rigor- this has not happened. 

The same rigor? You have literally just overlayed f68 over the map and said "look, when I arbitrarily overlay the stains on these 2 pages, they are in the same place" . I have done this multiple times in this thread to a more vigorous standard and shown that there are NOT consistencies. Every time I do so you say that I haven't, and then post another blurry image saying that its evidence. It's not. 

The burden of proof is on you to show matches, not us to prove that there aren't matches.

No- "It could be any page/any stain" will not work. 

How about "Your evidence is wrong. When you line up the image in the way that you did nothing closely matches". Show us things that match, specific things that match, or you have no evidence to back up anything you have said. 

[1] The Proto-Clock could mean anything, to which I have openly challenged others to find another location that can be deduced- this has not happened.

So because noone has made a different prediction using your framework, your framework must be true? This isn't even close to being logical. 

Your answers have hallucinations in them, you are constantly confusing who is claiming what (you were literally asking for better evidence for a match when that is supposed to be what you are doing). You have insulted me, multiple times!! Accused me of lying, accused me of spreading misinformation, and you have now convieniently deflected what I was saying and called it "semantics".  Those "semantics" are the underpinning of your entire image analysis. 

And all of that after you explicitly asked for respect? Respect is earned.

In the interest of my sanity (and the sanity of the mods, probably) I will no longer be engaging with this thread.