09-03-2026, 11:44 AM
(09-03-2026, 09:37 AM)Loose_Spell_9313 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You are correct, I will notate that it needs to be updated. Thank you for pointing that out. Good catch. It has been a long day defending myself and I'm a little tired. I apologize. Would certainly explain my initial measurements as opposed to the edited ones.
What were your initial measurements again?
(09-03-2026, 09:37 AM)Loose_Spell_9313 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Again, I'm tired- so I won't be going in to verify proportions at this hour. That said, you're showing one very small portion of the image and not showing the correlation underneath, which shows consistencies- my collages demonstrate this.
I showed both the full image and the entire stained area on the right. Your collages (which are tiny images that are impossible to see detail in) show no consistencies at all other than a broad stained area in both.
(09-03-2026, 09:37 AM)Loose_Spell_9313 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And as a counter proposal, I would like for you to demonstrate how well it aligns with other stains, because I think that's the best way for you to prove your point on this one. Without another match it's just a hypothetical.
You appear to be accidentally copying the part of the answer meant for you. You are the one claiming that the stains match.


