The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[tavie]

So, please, people, isn't it time to admit that the "therefore" above was wrong? 

You know what I'm going to say, Jorge:  first, you would have to establish that there was a "therefore" for "everyone".  

You've made similar points earlier in this thread and in other You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., so I'll emphasize to any newcomers that there is no forum dogma that the language has to be European.  The forum gave the Turkish solution a lot of goodwill at the start because some people already thought Turkish was a plausible candidate language due to its grammar.  And some people here don't even think there is a language.  And for those here who do think it is a European language, I doubt that many are inflexibly wedded to that view.  

Ultimately, we've yet to see any theory - whether European or 'Chinese' or neither - explain all the manuscript's strange statistics.