The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[Jorge_Stolfi]

I never mentioned lying or cheating.

Apologies if I misunderstood you.  I thought you said that I did search for a book that fit the statistics of the SPS, after I said that I did not.  

And you said that I tweaked the parag breaks to support the SPS≈SBJ claim; and that, I agree, would have been cheating.  But, again, no -- when I was revising the parag breaks, I had no idea of whether I was improving the histogram fit, or making it worse.  Again, in the end the change was not worth mentioning.

I have no particular interest in your theories other than MRT, which has some implications for decoding attempts, but given that MRT no longer appears plausible to me, I don't have much interest for it either.

Too bad, because I keep finding things that solve many outstanding puzzles.  But that is another thread...


All the best, --stolfi