The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[dashstofsk]

And you are asking us to believe that this is statistically significant?

Yes, because it definitely is.

No, it definitely isn't. You have generated no measure of level of statistical confidence in your hypothesis that there is a match between  aiin words and 'zhu'. Any professional statistician is going to swat the robustness of the analysis in your report. Your short report is short on analysis. The long paragraph does not give enough data on which the methods of statistical hypothesis testing can be used. The shape of the histograms of paragraph sizes are the shape of any random distribution.

I feel it is a bit high of you to stamp your report with the statement 'The Last Section of the Voynich Manuscript is the Chinese Medical Classic Shennong Bencaojin', and now to say 'it definitely is'.