The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[oshfdk]

Okay, so we say now it is not Chinese but some other unknown Oriental language of unknown vocabulary, grammar and everything. By chance it has the same patterns as Chinese for "use" word in one paragraph but different patterns for other words.

To be fair, I think it was described from the very beginning of the Chinese theory that the language is not necessarily Chinese, but some eastern monosyllabic language. The patterns for 'use' in English also closely mimic the pattern in Chinese, but English adds a lot of other recurring words, so in principle this could work.

As for the rest, I agree. Completely unverifiable and practically zero evidence so far.