The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[oshfdk]

I am sorry but page 8 has absolutely 0 evidence, and I mean it without offence, but I am quite surprised this is even taken seriously when we have seen "better" explained bogus theories ripped to shreds on this very forum.

I agree about 0 evidence, but it's not absolutely hopeless. I mean there is still nothing that would conclusively disprove the "Chinese" theory.

As others have already noted, daiin is followed by a bunch of different characters.
Zhu is followed 5 out of 7 times by zhi, once by zia and once by sha. There is no such pattern in the VM. The fact that daiir and odaiin have to be fitted to be daiin to even have a semblance of a match here speaks for itself. 

This is not a problem, the theory doesn't suggest literally Chinese, but some eastern language with monosyllable structure, so it's ok if the patterns are not fully matched.

Also, "Dan xiong ji, wei gan wei wen" is somehow "Poar keeo"?

This is an abridged version.