The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[oshfdk]

Evidently those other strings are not translations/transcriptions of 主 or 主治.

"You are claiming that 'gato' in that manuscript means 'cat', but then later on you decide that 'gata' also means 'cat', but there is also a 'gota' and 'pato' and other similar strings that you did not include in the graph"

Again, this is an explanation, this is not evidence. You can explain most, if not all, strange things with the Chinese theory, but for the Chinese theory to have any footing there should be direct evidence. "what if 主 matches with daiin, but it doesn't match well, but if we also match it with only one of two dairs and one laiin, then it does" - this is just a very convoluted way of saying "主 does NOT match with daiin".