IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)
#34
(03-02-2026, 05:35 PM)asteckley wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. it is highly improbable for any of them but one to have a relevance as strong as the one correct one

This is something I'm not at all sure of. In the past the task of constructing an anagram for a given meaning from a predefined sequence was prohibitively hard, but nowadays it may be much easier on a computer. Most anagrams made by hand sound a bit quirky and unnatural anyway, so as long as one can produce somethings specific, it might work even if the grammar is not perfect.

If I have time for this exercise, once Jorge_Stolfi publishes the announcement, I may try to come up with a good "decoding" of "what I meant" by ALL SOLUTIONS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ARE MORE SO. It's a gamble, but I won't be surprised if it's possible to get a reasonably plausible result quickly, up to the point where it will be hard to tell which one is more relevant.


Messages In This Thread
RE: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of) - by oshfdk - 03-02-2026, 08:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is there any protocols to identify what sort of document MS-408 is? conlangyalesbaby 27 5,083 17-07-2026, 11:40 PM
Last Post: ReneZ

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)