The Voynich Manuscript is NOT a cipher

[Jorge_Stolfi]

In the meantime, go ahead and ask ChatGPT to build you a 12,000-entry dictionary with 99.67% corpus coverage.

What are your entries? Words? That makes some problem because Voynich manuscript has only about 8000 unique words.

And many of those are hapaxes (words that occur only once).  How could you have deduced their meaning, since it seems that you still don't know precisely what the language is? (Romance and Latin are very different things.  For one thing, Romance has no cases...)

All the best, --stolfi

PS. And I bet that if I asked ChatGPT to create a 12,000 entry dictionary with 99.67% coverage of the VMS lexicon, it would not blink once and say "Sure! Here it is ...."

PPS. There is a lot more than 1% of errors in the VMS, including words split in half, joined words, words with illegible or ambiguous glyphs, etc.  So if your lexicon has 99.67% coverage, that alone says "bullshit"...