The Modern Forgery Hypothesis

[asteckley]

But none of this can disprove a suspicion no matter how unlikely it is.  What would invalidate your theory?

A theory like MFT can be always be proven wrong by the weight of evidence in favor of a counter-theory of authenticity. There is some evidence for a genuine 15th century origin, but it is just far from enough to be called proof.

And it appears that is not my isolated opinion, given the extensive and ongoing discussions around the MFT (as seen even in this thread).