Just a hoax?

[Jorge_Stolfi]

The language grammar used in the Rohonc Codex is loose. For me it is actually quite similar to a pidgin. It looks ugly.  But the sentences make sense, make patterns and make a consistent story which agrees with the Bible. So it was most probably grammatical for the author.

I see!  But could it be just a yet unidentified natural language?

Are there identifiable grammatical rules? Like, SVO (subject-verb-object) or SOV order, articles, prepositions ("of", "to", "at", "in", ...), explicit word for "and", pronouns?

Since the writing is ideographic, I suppose that there are no inflections or declensions, no identifiable gender and number, right?

All the best, --stolfi