The Modern Forgery Hypothesis

[R. Sale]

Here's another perspective. The artist has intentionally drawn a pareidolic object. It's not the first one. 

The purpose of the pareidolic object is to express two different concepts simultaneously, while perpetually frozen on the page. The basic idea of the VMs Agnus Dei interpretation compares only with singular structure of BNF Fr. 13096 f 18. An old manuscript in the Burgundian library for a time.

The second interpretation is also Burgundian, based on the Order of the Golden Fleece (1430), the critter is also a fleece. Dead and alive at the same time. Isn't that interesting? Don't you love those oxymorons? Check the VMs cosmos - seriously.

It's not about appearance. It's about structure. Here are fleeces that are *intended to look like fleeces*. Look at the artistic variation. Is the VMs outside that realm of variation? Especially given its intentional duality / ambiguity / pareidolia.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

"The dude has been playing over our heads," you might say. The artistry contains these strangely valid, historical Easter Eggs. Some even coincide with the C-14 dates, others are earlier, and there are a few hints of later, that might be interesting, but not that late.