08-01-2026, 10:03 AM
I think so because the overall structure of the text appears to follow an agglutinative language pattern. In particular, the placement of nouns, verbal nouns, and predicates seems consistent with Ottoman Turkish syntax.
I have followed Ahmet Ardıç’s work to some extent. Honestly, I find his interpretations largely inconsistent and not well aligned with the internal structure of the text. His readings do not seem to respect the grammatical and positional regularities that the manuscript itself suggests.
I have followed Ahmet Ardıç’s work to some extent. Honestly, I find his interpretations largely inconsistent and not well aligned with the internal structure of the text. His readings do not seem to respect the grammatical and positional regularities that the manuscript itself suggests.
(07-01-2026, 03:21 PM)Rafal wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hello,
Quote:However, Ottoman Turkish exhibits a more flexible and organic compatibility with the Voynich text.Why do you think so?
And another question - do you know about the work of Ahmet Ardic? What do you think about it?