The Modern Forgery Hypothesis

[Legit]

...
As for Voynich Manuscript I believe that we cannot say that fake is just a fake. If I understand your position correctly you claim that it is 20th century fake of Wilfrid Voynich. And I am close to opinion that it is a fake of some anonymous 15th century German charlatan and his team. Such opinions aren't compatible, they involve accepting and not accepting different things as "truth".
...

To call the author a 15th century German charlatan is quite a compliment.  Since the people of the time believed all kinds of superstition nonsense this would be like claiming the author is some kind of genius enlightened pragmatist. As if he knew better than to fall for beliefs about the stars, zodiac, and healing properties of plants yet still chose to write a book about it.