31-12-2025, 10:56 PM
Retracing to one side, seeing the last symbol like this makes me wonder if we have a symbol between r and n
There's a fair few r in the manuscript transliterations that the modifications start in the middle rather than the top (though much more rare)
A while back I noted a French document that seemed to have many repeating daiin it was a legal document listing all of someone's possessions to be taken into account. It was identified as dautre, though the d also showed some uncertain spacing like daiin because I believe it is technically d'autre. - Post - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
We would be missing the flick, but I wonder if modification placement is relevant to the glyphs in a similar way, like if we have r n then maybe the middle is t (or just "different to") and not a poorly placed r modifier.
There's a fair few r in the manuscript transliterations that the modifications start in the middle rather than the top (though much more rare)
A while back I noted a French document that seemed to have many repeating daiin it was a legal document listing all of someone's possessions to be taken into account. It was identified as dautre, though the d also showed some uncertain spacing like daiin because I believe it is technically d'autre. - Post - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
We would be missing the flick, but I wonder if modification placement is relevant to the glyphs in a similar way, like if we have r n then maybe the middle is t (or just "different to") and not a poorly placed r modifier.