The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against

[Rafal]

But I now think I can still do some useful research on the VMS even with that handicap. 

Actually AI makes it today much more easier to work with foreign languages, even the ones we don't know.

But personally even with AI I wouldn't be able to break even simplest Chinese cipher. The language barrier is too big.

And, as you say, it doesn't have to be Chinese. It is actually "Far East monosyllabic language theory", not Chinese theory. And we are speaking of 600 years old dialects.

You probably know the idea of scientific falsifiability ( You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ). Claims should be made that way that it is possible in practice to prove them wrong. I wonder if your Chinese theory is falsifiable for us. Personally I have no idea how I could prove that it isn't Chinese without speaking it.

And learning Chinese is a nightmare for someone with European background. I heard that 90% of people who start learning it at some moment give up. You learn it for half a year and you are unable to read the simplest text and you are unable to say any sentence correctly and be understood  

I have also heard that Chinese uses a lot of sayings, proverbs and methaphors. If you don't use them and speak plainly then you are a boor  A Chinese girl won't say "I am pretty, you are ugly", she will say "I am a swan, you are a frog" and so on. I heard they use such stuff even in official legal documents.  So you don't just learn language but also all these proverbs. It makes it really impenetrable.

But I am really curious what you will come to Jorge.