23-11-2025, 02:24 PM
Quote:Just my personal opinion, but for a while already I stopped trying to understand all the mathematical/statistical articles or posts related to the Voynich Manuscript, it seems to me they don't lead anywhere. They just add one conjecture or curiosity on top of another.
Going a bit offtopic, I feel something a bit similar.
People do some analysis that 90% of people on this site don't fully understand, not to speak about the general population
They say that Voynich has some patterns typical for natural languages and is not random. Then they also admit that it has some patterns not typical for natural languages. And then they stop and don't deliver anything more.Who is going to continue with these results if not they themselves? If you have some words that go together or work as central nodes in words network then you could try to go on another level, from statistics to linguistics and try to assign them some meaning. It could work or not but you will not know if you won't try.
But they never do it. I am not siure why.