22-11-2025, 02:06 PM
@Doireannjane:
What exactly is wrong with ReneZ's statement? All I can see is that he said the translated sentence looks like "word salad" and that it is similar to previous translation attemps made by thousands of other people in hundreds of different languages and dialects. And I agree with him. It does look like word salad. There is no reason why we should have to walk on egg shells when evaluating a theory.
This is such an important point that I believe it needs to be adressed for your theory to have any credibility.
What exactly is wrong with ReneZ's statement? All I can see is that he said the translated sentence looks like "word salad" and that it is similar to previous translation attemps made by thousands of other people in hundreds of different languages and dialects. And I agree with him. It does look like word salad. There is no reason why we should have to walk on egg shells when evaluating a theory.
(22-11-2025, 01:42 PM)igajkgko wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If you can translate forged sentences, your translation "works" for anything and manages to "make sense" out of gibberish. It's thus independent of any original meaning and "works" no-matter what language the voynich is actually encoding (if any), or how it's encoded.
This is such an important point that I believe it needs to be adressed for your theory to have any credibility.