20-11-2025, 10:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 20-11-2025, 10:29 PM by Jorge_Stolfi.)
(20-11-2025, 09:50 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.No one who had spent time with authentic manuscripts could look at this codex today and not immediately realize that it was a modern forgery. While not "proof", this does speak to the idea of the VMS being a modern forgery - there's just no way anyone could pull that off convincingly.
I don't doubt it. But just curious. The date of that forged codex is 1890, right? When was it found to be a forgery?
I gather that the Vinland Map was forged in the 1950s but the first solid evidence of forgery was found in 1972, and it still took a decade or two for that to become a consensus. Does that mean that forensics is catching up with the forgers? Or are they still decades ahead?
All the best, --stolfi


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)