09-11-2025, 03:42 PM
(09-11-2025, 10:51 AM)Antonio García Jiménez wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm really enjoying this debate. It's like debating with flat-Earthers. It's not relevant to the Voynich investigation, but it teaches a lot about human nature.
That the Voynich manuscript is an authentic codex is undeniable, even though its contents are very difficult to understand. I recommend watching the video Koen G made, where he clearly presented this evidence.
Hi Antonio: The mockery of alternate theories is a common, but fallacious tactic in debate. Unfortunately it runs rampant in science, politics and philosophy, but usually when proper rebuttal to countering ideas is not possible.
It would be quite easy for me to do the same for opposing arguments, but I do not need to.
Also, I do not rely on the opinions of others, I believe strongly that one should look to the source materials, when and if they are available, and make up my own mind. Your us Koen's video as a standard of the anti-Modern Forgery case is an example of this. The video is clearly addressed at my own arguments, but in order to appear to make its case, it is very incomplete. It misstates many of the claims and premises of my Modern Forgery theory, and it selectively leaves out the many problems and anomalies the Voynich clearly exhibits.
It is a perfect example of my claim that the 1420 Genuine European Cipher Theory depends on omission to exist, while in contrast, Modern Forgery explains every scrap of everything known about the manuscript.
If interested, you should be able to see my three part rebuttal, with video time stamps for easy access, in the comments below You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My youtube user name is "proto57", and so far there are 520 comments, so it should be easy to search for and find. If you are truly a believer in knowing the whole story, and against the sort of myopic and selective "reasoning" that we both agree undermines poor theories, you will read it.
Also.. although for some reason (!!!) it will not open for me, now, I put a link to my counter to Rene's "NoFake" pages, which Koen linked in his pinned comment. If it does not appear for you, either, here it is: "https://proto57.wordpress.com/2019/08/05/rebuttal-to-nofake/
Note, by the way, that my rebuttal was NOT linked under the "nofake" link, while I do link "nofake" in my rebuttal!