06-11-2025, 08:28 PM
If we read more relevant history, we will know more facts. Consider the VMs use of heraldry. The VMs artist built the structure for heraldic canting in the first three zodiac pages. From the modern perspective, however, the necessary artistic elements are unknown and unnamed and cannot be recognized without the historical, heraldic connection.
Despite the profusion of botanical pages, some of the VMs illustrations do seem to contain historical information, and much of it occurs after 1300 and matches with the parchment C-14 dates. At the same time, the VMs artist is not clear and demonstrative, but ambiguous and partly deceptive. The copy of a pictorial Earth would be another pictorial Earth, but not in the VMs cosmos. White Aries is clearly dualistic. Historical reference information was used by the artist, but it was also altered. Structure is maintained; so, it's still the same thing, but alternative variations in the visual elements were used to maximize the difference in appearance like the stars in comparative cosmic illustrations. This is why interpretations based too much on appearance are misdirected.
Clearly the artist for these VMs illustrations, knew a lot more 15th Century information than has been recognized by the first century of VMs investigation. Who is likely to possess that level of information? A person contemporary with the era 1400-1450 or someone later?
Despite the profusion of botanical pages, some of the VMs illustrations do seem to contain historical information, and much of it occurs after 1300 and matches with the parchment C-14 dates. At the same time, the VMs artist is not clear and demonstrative, but ambiguous and partly deceptive. The copy of a pictorial Earth would be another pictorial Earth, but not in the VMs cosmos. White Aries is clearly dualistic. Historical reference information was used by the artist, but it was also altered. Structure is maintained; so, it's still the same thing, but alternative variations in the visual elements were used to maximize the difference in appearance like the stars in comparative cosmic illustrations. This is why interpretations based too much on appearance are misdirected.
Clearly the artist for these VMs illustrations, knew a lot more 15th Century information than has been recognized by the first century of VMs investigation. Who is likely to possess that level of information? A person contemporary with the era 1400-1450 or someone later?