The Modern Forgery Hypothesis

[R. Sale]

In Post #110, @ReneZ said about the VMs: "As a result of this erratic behaviour, the book cannot be distinguished, even using all modern forensic testing, from a late medieval manuscript, with parchment from the start of the 15th century, clothing from the early 15th century, a 15th century zodiac."

Those are not the only the only examples. The so-called "Oresme"-type cosmos is dated c. 1410 in BNF Fr. 565. There is also better evidence of time and place. The C-14 dating helped to focus historical research and some of those investigations have produced results.

Clothing: sleeves: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

And as far as the ridiculous armadillo splashing in a puddle...
@Proto57 said in Post #112: "Yes. Why leave the armadillo? I think that if every bit of such un-Bacon evidence had been removed, he would have ended up with a four page herbal pamphlet!"

Even the Agnus Dei in the Apocalypse of S Jean of 1313 [BNF Fr. 13096] is anachronist to Roger Bacon (d. 1292).

So, what's with all the anachronisms? Is WMV thumbing his nose as if he can fly? Does he even know what is there on the pages? A historical reference to the mid 13th C., presented in VMs White Aries, was never recognized. If WMV was involved in VMs creation, how was he so knowledgeable and audacious and so uninformed at the same time?