02-11-2025, 01:01 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2025, 01:02 AM by Bluetoes101.)
That's it, that's what you got from this whole situation? Yes, I confess... the discussion was partly about...
ok
- the importance and implications of finding this watermark and identifying it.
agreed
- because watermarks are evidence used to determine age, geographic origins, and, sorry, authenticity
No, you inserted that unprompted to insert your ideas to the thread.
- and so, yes, I pointed out that this watermark might, in some cases, be used to help determine authenticity, based on whether or not other Marci paper used it
Above.
- As Lisa did, in using the "Absence of Evidence it not evidence of absence argument", which in this case was saying that even if a known Marci example was not found, the letter could still be real... yet, I would never even consider that Lisa's point be censored, or moved, for suggesting reasons the watermark find might always imply genuine.
This statement was made after your post. Yes, obviously.
I don't have any compliant against you. I think some posts in here are condescending and rude to Tavie, that makes me a bit uncomfortable and I thought they were unneeded. While I don't find your theory obviously appealing to me I've been taking time to read it and will continue to.
ok
- the importance and implications of finding this watermark and identifying it.
agreed
- because watermarks are evidence used to determine age, geographic origins, and, sorry, authenticity
No, you inserted that unprompted to insert your ideas to the thread.
- and so, yes, I pointed out that this watermark might, in some cases, be used to help determine authenticity, based on whether or not other Marci paper used it
Above.
- As Lisa did, in using the "Absence of Evidence it not evidence of absence argument", which in this case was saying that even if a known Marci example was not found, the letter could still be real... yet, I would never even consider that Lisa's point be censored, or moved, for suggesting reasons the watermark find might always imply genuine.
This statement was made after your post. Yes, obviously.
I don't have any compliant against you. I think some posts in here are condescending and rude to Tavie, that makes me a bit uncomfortable and I thought they were unneeded. While I don't find your theory obviously appealing to me I've been taking time to read it and will continue to.