01-11-2025, 03:36 AM
[quote="Jorge_Stolfi" pid='72467' dateline='1761962145']
The anatomical drawings are quite crude.
/quote]
This is something I think is quite underrated on here from all sides. Whatever the provenance, the drawings are...not the best left to us by whatever period they hail from. I'm somewhat pessimistic about any theory or refutation that hinges on confident identification of the artwork. There's a real risk of building whatever deductions you make from there on sand, and even if one has identified everything correctly, the number of competing identifications makes proving it quite daunting!
The anatomical drawings are quite crude.
/quote]
This is something I think is quite underrated on here from all sides. Whatever the provenance, the drawings are...not the best left to us by whatever period they hail from. I'm somewhat pessimistic about any theory or refutation that hinges on confident identification of the artwork. There's a real risk of building whatever deductions you make from there on sand, and even if one has identified everything correctly, the number of competing identifications makes proving it quite daunting!

